By way of PTI
NEW DELHI: The Ideal Court docket Friday mentioned it’ll take a choice at the early list of petitions difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 which had given particular standing to Jammu and Kashmir.
A bench comprising Leader Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala took notice of the submissions of senior suggest Raju Ramachandran, showing for one of the most events, that the pleas wanted an pressing listening to.
“All proper. I can take a choice on it,” the CJI mentioned.
On December 14, remaining yr additionally, the pleas for pressing list had been discussed ahead of the bench via Radha Kumar, an educational and creator, who had intervened in pending petitions.
Previous on April 25 and September 23, remaining yr, a bench headed via the then CJI N V Ramana, since retired, had agreed to record for listening to the pleas difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370.
The apex court docket should re-constitute a five-judge bench to listen to the pleas as ex-CJI Ramana and Justice R Subhash Reddy, who had been a part of the five-judge bench which had heard the pleas, have retired.
But even so the 2 former judges, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, B R Gavai and Surya Kant had been a part of the bench which, on March 2, 2020, had declined to consult with a bigger seven-judge bench the batch of petitions difficult the constitutional validity of the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 on August 5, 2019.
A number of petitions difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which break up J-Okay into two Union Territories “Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh” had been referred to a Charter Bench headed via Justice Ramana in 2019 via the then CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
ALSO READ | Pakistan PM provides peace talks, however ties it to Article 370
By way of abrogating Article 370, the Central govt revoked the particular standing of Jammu and Kashmir.
NGO, Folks’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), Jammu and Kashmir Prime Court docket Bar Affiliation, and an intervenor had sought referring of the topic to a bigger bench on grounds that two judgements of the apex court docket — Prem Nath Kaul as opposed to Jammu and Kashmir in 1959 and Sampat Prakash as opposed to Jammu and Kashmir in 1970 — which handled the problem of Article 370 conflicted each and every different and due to this fact, the present bench of 5 judges may now not pay attention the problem.
ALSO READ | Ideal Court docket consents to listen to plea on nullification of Article 370
Disagreeing with the petitioners, the bench had mentioned it used to be of the opinion that “there’s no war between the judgements”.
NEW DELHI: The Ideal Court docket Friday mentioned it’ll take a choice at the early list of petitions difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 which had given particular standing to Jammu and Kashmir.
A bench comprising Leader Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala took notice of the submissions of senior suggest Raju Ramachandran, showing for one of the most events, that the pleas wanted an pressing listening to.
“All proper. I can take a choice on it,” the CJI mentioned.
On December 14, remaining yr additionally, the pleas for pressing list had been discussed ahead of the bench via Radha Kumar, an educational and creator, who had intervened in pending petitions.
Previous on April 25 and September 23, remaining yr, a bench headed via the then CJI N V Ramana, since retired, had agreed to record for listening to the pleas difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370.
The apex court docket should re-constitute a five-judge bench to listen to the pleas as ex-CJI Ramana and Justice R Subhash Reddy, who had been a part of the five-judge bench which had heard the pleas, have retired.
But even so the 2 former judges, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, B R Gavai and Surya Kant had been a part of the bench which, on March 2, 2020, had declined to consult with a bigger seven-judge bench the batch of petitions difficult the constitutional validity of the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 on August 5, 2019.
A number of petitions difficult the Centre’s choice to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which break up J-Okay into two Union Territories “Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh” had been referred to a Charter Bench headed via Justice Ramana in 2019 via the then CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
ALSO READ | Pakistan PM provides peace talks, however ties it to Article 370
By way of abrogating Article 370, the Central govt revoked the particular standing of Jammu and Kashmir.
NGO, Folks’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), Jammu and Kashmir Prime Court docket Bar Affiliation, and an intervenor had sought referring of the topic to a bigger bench on grounds that two judgements of the apex court docket — Prem Nath Kaul as opposed to Jammu and Kashmir in 1959 and Sampat Prakash as opposed to Jammu and Kashmir in 1970 — which handled the problem of Article 370 conflicted each and every different and due to this fact, the present bench of 5 judges may now not pay attention the problem.
ALSO READ | Ideal Court docket consents to listen to plea on nullification of Article 370
Disagreeing with the petitioners, the bench had mentioned it used to be of the opinion that “there’s no war between the judgements”.
