Categorical Information Carrier
NEW DELHI: Father of the sufferer in the 2012 Chhawla gang rape and homicide case has approached SC searching for overview of its verdict of acquitting 3 loss of life row convicts.
The convicts have been acquitted by means of a bench of former CJI UU Lalit, Justices SR Bhat and Bela M Trivedi on November 7 at the floor that the prosecution didn’t end up fees. The courtroom had noticed that the prosecution has to carry house the fees levelled towards them past cheap doubt, which the prosecution had failed to take action.
“It can be true that if the accused concerned within the heinous crime move unpunished or are acquitted, a type of agony and frustration could also be led to to the society on the whole and to the circle of relatives of the sufferer particularly, alternatively, the regulation does now not allow the Courts to punish the accused at the foundation of ethical conviction or on suspicion by myself,” the SC had stated.
Looking for overview, the plea argued that the highest courtroom had unnoticed testimonies of subject material witnesses and didn’t recognize that there was once no hole left within the chain of proof which pointed against the guilt of the accused.
“There’s an error obvious at the face of file because the SC has erred in now not appreciating the testimonies of subject material witnesses which best direct against the guilt of the accused individuals and are incompatible with their innocence,” the plea had mentioned.
The plea additionally stated, “The identification of the accused individuals and their involvement within the heinous crime dedicated towards the deceased sufferer has been duly proved past cheap doubt”.
Folks additionally contended that the courtroom erred in watching that there’s doubt within the prosecution’s tale.
NEW DELHI: Father of the sufferer in the 2012 Chhawla gang rape and homicide case has approached SC searching for overview of its verdict of acquitting 3 loss of life row convicts.
The convicts have been acquitted by means of a bench of former CJI UU Lalit, Justices SR Bhat and Bela M Trivedi on November 7 at the floor that the prosecution didn’t end up fees. The courtroom had noticed that the prosecution has to carry house the fees levelled towards them past cheap doubt, which the prosecution had failed to take action.
“It can be true that if the accused concerned within the heinous crime move unpunished or are acquitted, a type of agony and frustration could also be led to to the society on the whole and to the circle of relatives of the sufferer particularly, alternatively, the regulation does now not allow the Courts to punish the accused at the foundation of ethical conviction or on suspicion by myself,” the SC had stated.
Looking for overview, the plea argued that the highest courtroom had unnoticed testimonies of subject material witnesses and didn’t recognize that there was once no hole left within the chain of proof which pointed against the guilt of the accused.
“There’s an error obvious at the face of file because the SC has erred in now not appreciating the testimonies of subject material witnesses which best direct against the guilt of the accused individuals and are incompatible with their innocence,” the plea had mentioned.
The plea additionally stated, “The identification of the accused individuals and their involvement within the heinous crime dedicated towards the deceased sufferer has been duly proved past cheap doubt”.
Folks additionally contended that the courtroom erred in watching that there’s doubt within the prosecution’s tale.
