In a democratic gadget, the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005 is valuable with the purpose of making sure transparency and responsibility within the functioning of presidency and management. This act is proving to be a millstone to make the electorate conscious in regards to the actions of the federal government. Chhattisgarh State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. AK Agarwal has advisable disciplinary motion towards a Public Knowledge Officer, enforcing a fantastic of Rs. 25 thousand each and every on 5 instances.
Below the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005, Mr. Gorelal Sahu of Raipura carried out to Public Knowledge Officer and Assistant Conservator of Forests (CAMPA), Leader Govt Officer CAMPA Mahasamund on 27 March 2021, qualified CAMPA Shape 14 to be had within the place of job from September 2020 to February 2021 A replica was once demanded. On non-receipt of knowledge, a criticism was once submitted to the Fee on 3 June 2021.
State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. AK Agrawal, within the listening to of the case, discovered that the reaction of the Public Knowledge Officer at the criticism software of the applicant was once no longer discovered to be adequate and adequate, the then Public Knowledge Officer and Assistant Conservator of Forests (CAMPA), Leader Govt Officer CAMPA Mahasamund Mr. Implementing a fantastic of Rs 25,000 on DKS Maurya below Phase 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005, Foremost Leader Conservator of Forests, Aranya Bhawan, Nava Raipur has been directed to recuperate the volume of good from the involved and ship the tips to the Fee. Do it.
In a similar fashion, on January 15, 2020, Mr. Nitin Singhvi, Raipur, in an software to the Public Knowledge Officer and Woodland Officer, Mahasamund, after making use of radio collars to elephants, the paperwork associated with the motion house of elephants, which flora and fauna SOS has submitted to the Mahasamund wooded area department, qualified the ones paperwork. Requested to offer copies below Proper to Knowledge. On being disappointed with the verdict of the Public Knowledge Officer and the First Appellate Officer, a 2d enchantment was once introduced sooner than the Fee on 18 August 2020. State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Aggarwal discovered all the way through the listening to that the then Public Knowledge Officer Mr. Mayank Pandey, Divisional Woodland Officer, Common Woodland Department, Mahasamund, the present posting, Divisional Woodland Officer, Balod, didn’t unravel the felony factor and didn’t ship any respond to the Fee in enhance of the Proper to Knowledge Act, 2005. Implementing a fantastic of Rs 25 thousand below Phase 20(1), the Secretary Woodland and Local weather Alternate Division has been advisable to take disciplinary motion.
The applicant Mr. Virendra Pandey, New Shanti Nagar Raipur, transferred the applying gained by means of the Public Knowledge Officer, Phase Rights, Common Management Division, to the Public Knowledge Officer, Ministry of Public Works Division, Mahanadi Bhawan, below Phase 6(3)(III) of the Proper to Knowledge Act, 2005. Within the software, the criticism of the asphalt rip-off in PWD was once introduced within the yr 2013, which was once made up our minds to be investigated by means of the Financial Offenses Investigation Bureau. Within the absence of investigation, we now have written 10 reminders for motion by means of getting the investigation performed once in a while. Demanded a replica of the notesheet used from the date of criticism until the date of software and the motion taken at the reminder letters and replica of all correspondence. Public Knowledge Officer Mr. C. Tirkey, in his answer sooner than the State Knowledge Commissioner, mentioned that it isn’t imaginable to offer knowledge because of the subject being pending within the Hon’ble Prime Court docket, in his answer, the State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Aggarwal, Phase 8(1)(a) of the Proper to Knowledge Act L) Regarding the then Public Knowledge Officer C Tirkey, Public Works Division, provide posting Deputy Secretary Chhattisgarh Govt Housing and Atmosphere Division, Ministry of Nava Raipur, below segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act, 2005 imposed a fantastic of Rs.
The applicant Mr. Dashrath Kumar Verma, Raipur, in his two programs, demanded a replica of the MB e-book and an authorized replica of the fee voucher associated with Chhattisgarh Housing Board Department-3 Raipur contract quantity 238 and 244. The ideas sought by means of the applicant was once declared unclear by means of the Public Knowledge Officer, because of which the applicant introduced the primary enchantment. The First Appellate Authority made up our minds to give you the knowledge sought by means of the applicant inside 15 days. In the second one enchantment, the State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Aggarwal discovered within the listening to of the case that the Public Knowledge Officer, Chhattisgarh Housing Board Department, didn’t take any felony motion at the applicant’s software and didn’t give adequate and adequate solutions to the tips letters of the Fee. 3 Raipur Mr. Shriram Thakur, below Phase 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act, 2005, imposed a fantastic of Rs. 25-25 thousand and directed the Commissioner, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Durg, District Durg, to recuperate the volume of imposed fantastic and switch it to the federal government fund. Tell the Fee by means of depositing it in
Like this:
Like Loading…
Proceed Studying
