Via PTI
NEW DELHI: The Splendid Courtroom on Tuesday admitted the pleas searching for ‘Talaq-e-Hasan’ and all different kinds of “unilateral extrajudicial divorce” to be declared unconstitutional.
‘Talaq-e-Hasan’ is a type of divorce amongst Muslims in which a person can dissolve the wedding by way of saying the phrase ‘talaq’ as soon as each month over a three-month duration.
A 3-judge bench headed by way of Justice S Ok Kaul requested the Centre, Nationwide Fee for Girls, Nationwide Human Rights Fee and others to record their responses inside 4 weeks.
“Recommend for the non-public respondent (husband) has entered look and seeks to verify that he’s no longer agreeable to agreement even at the factor of additional alimony.
Checklist within the 3rd week of January for ultimate listening to,” the bench, additionally comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Vikram Nath, mentioned.
The apex court docket was once listening to 3 separate petitions, together with the only filed by way of Ghaziabad resident Benazeer Heena, who claimed to be sufferers of unilateral extrajudicial Talaq-e-Hasan.
They’ve additionally sought path to the Centre to border the ideas for gender and religion-neutral and uniform grounds of divorce and process for all voters.
The highest court docket had previous impeached the husbands of the petitioners and sought their reaction to the pleas filed by way of them.
When the listening to commenced nowadays, the attorney showing for Benazeer’s husband knowledgeable the court docket that no agreement was once conceivable within the dispute together with his spouse.
The bench then requested the events to record their responses and mentioned it is going to pay attention the case within the 3rd week of January, 2023.
The highest court docket had in August mentioned its number one center of attention is to supply aid to 2 ladies, who claimed to be sufferers of Talaq-e-Hasan, sooner than deciding the constitutional validity of this type of divorce.
Beneath Talaq-e-Hasan, a divorce will get formalised after the 3rd utterance of the phrase ‘talaq’ within the 3rd month if cohabitation has no longer resumed right through this era.
Then again, if cohabitation resumes after the primary or 2nd utterance of talaq, the events are assumed to have reconciled.
NEW DELHI: The Splendid Courtroom on Tuesday admitted the pleas searching for ‘Talaq-e-Hasan’ and all different kinds of “unilateral extrajudicial divorce” to be declared unconstitutional.
‘Talaq-e-Hasan’ is a type of divorce amongst Muslims in which a person can dissolve the wedding by way of saying the phrase ‘talaq’ as soon as each month over a three-month duration.
A 3-judge bench headed by way of Justice S Ok Kaul requested the Centre, Nationwide Fee for Girls, Nationwide Human Rights Fee and others to record their responses inside 4 weeks.
“Recommend for the non-public respondent (husband) has entered look and seeks to verify that he’s no longer agreeable to agreement even at the factor of additional alimony.
Checklist within the 3rd week of January for ultimate listening to,” the bench, additionally comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Vikram Nath, mentioned.
The apex court docket was once listening to 3 separate petitions, together with the only filed by way of Ghaziabad resident Benazeer Heena, who claimed to be sufferers of unilateral extrajudicial Talaq-e-Hasan.
They’ve additionally sought path to the Centre to border the ideas for gender and religion-neutral and uniform grounds of divorce and process for all voters.
The highest court docket had previous impeached the husbands of the petitioners and sought their reaction to the pleas filed by way of them.
When the listening to commenced nowadays, the attorney showing for Benazeer’s husband knowledgeable the court docket that no agreement was once conceivable within the dispute together with his spouse.
The bench then requested the events to record their responses and mentioned it is going to pay attention the case within the 3rd week of January, 2023.
The highest court docket had in August mentioned its number one center of attention is to supply aid to 2 ladies, who claimed to be sufferers of Talaq-e-Hasan, sooner than deciding the constitutional validity of this type of divorce.
Beneath Talaq-e-Hasan, a divorce will get formalised after the 3rd utterance of the phrase ‘talaq’ within the 3rd month if cohabitation has no longer resumed right through this era.
Then again, if cohabitation resumes after the primary or 2nd utterance of talaq, the events are assumed to have reconciled.
