Through PTI
NEW DELHI: Former Mumbai police commissioner Sanjay Pandey has moved a Delhi court docket looking for bail in a case of alleged telephone tapping of NSE staff, claiming that ED lawsuits in opposition to him have been the results of political fallout.
The petition is more likely to arise for listening to on August 2 ahead of particular pass judgement on Sunena Sharma.
In his petition, Pandey mentioned he had investigated and prosecuted a number of high-profile and politically delicate circumstances, and claimed that the existing lawsuits have been “a political fallout of fair and trustworthy discharge of his tasks as a senior police officer”.
“The moment case is obviously motivated via political issues and additionally it is glaring from the truth that an offence that allegedly came about between 2009 and 2017 is being investigated in 2022 i.e., 13 years after its purported graduation and 5 years after its purported closure; and that too inside every week of the applicant emitting his administrative center,” he mentioned.
The appliance additionally mentioned that a large extend used to be led to within the registration of the FIR, which raised severe doubts at the bona fides of the investigation.
“Apparently that the applicant (Sanjay Pandey) is arraigned within the provide case, for no fault of his personal, and handiest to fulfil some political vendetta,” it mentioned.
The court docket has issued a understand to the ED at the utility and sought its answer on August 2.
Pandey used to be arrested via the investigating company on July 19 within the case.
The ED arrested former NSE MD Chitra Ramakrishnan on July 14 following her interrogation after taking permission from the court docket, the place she used to be constituted of prison on an order handed via the pass judgement on previous.
The pass judgement on had issued a manufacturing warrant in opposition to Ramakrishnan on a plea moved via the ED. After she used to be produced, the ED took permission from the court docket to interrogate her.
Later, the company arrested Ramakrishnan on grounds of non-cooperation and once more produced her ahead of the court docket, and instructed for a nine-day custodial interrogation. The court docket, on the other hand, had granted 4 days’ custody.
Ramakrishnan used to be arrested via the CBI in a separate case, and used to be in judicial custody.
NEW DELHI: Former Mumbai police commissioner Sanjay Pandey has moved a Delhi court docket looking for bail in a case of alleged telephone tapping of NSE staff, claiming that ED lawsuits in opposition to him have been the results of political fallout.
The petition is more likely to arise for listening to on August 2 ahead of particular pass judgement on Sunena Sharma.
In his petition, Pandey mentioned he had investigated and prosecuted a number of high-profile and politically delicate circumstances, and claimed that the existing lawsuits have been “a political fallout of fair and trustworthy discharge of his tasks as a senior police officer”.
“The moment case is obviously motivated via political issues and additionally it is glaring from the truth that an offence that allegedly came about between 2009 and 2017 is being investigated in 2022 i.e., 13 years after its purported graduation and 5 years after its purported closure; and that too inside every week of the applicant emitting his administrative center,” he mentioned.
The appliance additionally mentioned that a large extend used to be led to within the registration of the FIR, which raised severe doubts at the bona fides of the investigation.
“Apparently that the applicant (Sanjay Pandey) is arraigned within the provide case, for no fault of his personal, and handiest to fulfil some political vendetta,” it mentioned.
The court docket has issued a understand to the ED at the utility and sought its answer on August 2.
Pandey used to be arrested via the investigating company on July 19 within the case.
The ED arrested former NSE MD Chitra Ramakrishnan on July 14 following her interrogation after taking permission from the court docket, the place she used to be constituted of prison on an order handed via the pass judgement on previous.
The pass judgement on had issued a manufacturing warrant in opposition to Ramakrishnan on a plea moved via the ED. After she used to be produced, the ED took permission from the court docket to interrogate her.
Later, the company arrested Ramakrishnan on grounds of non-cooperation and once more produced her ahead of the court docket, and instructed for a nine-day custodial interrogation. The court docket, on the other hand, had granted 4 days’ custody.
Ramakrishnan used to be arrested via the CBI in a separate case, and used to be in judicial custody.
